My Biggest Holy Sh** Moment of the Year

Was it LBJ? Was it the mob? Was George Bush the man on the hill? Why were the limo's switched out? Did Aristotle Onassis call the hit? Was it the Russians? Was it the CIA? Was it Clay Shaw? Was it a Cuban hit? The Hoffa connection? Was Oswald a member the CIA? Was it the Industrial Military Complex? Was it a Federal Reserve Hit? Was it big oil?

E Howard Hunt's private diary is supposed to be among the papers. That would be telling. We'll see. At least we'll have them in my lifetime. 25 years more would be crap

@psycholime - you forgot Ted Cruz's father!

Cant trust the Cubans in this Rafael has direct ties to Castro and Ted Cruz admits this in his memoirs. Cubans, Communist, CIA, Castro, Carcano rifle, Calgary safe house and of course Cruz.

Yeah...Rafael Cruz moves to the top of the list out of obscurity...just as the primary field gets competitive...a pretty stunning coincidence.

Cruz moved to the top of no list. That he "may have" been with LHO is being nothing more than a known associate. 

1) I like leaps of faith
2) Chris Matthews says anyone who believes anyone OTHER than LHO was involved, ie any conspiracy, is a nut job. That is 4/5 of America
3) I started a thread on Jack the Ripper is HH Holmes here after I got flamed in another group. I am not saying your view is anything close to a flame. It is a  disagreement, which I like to challenge. 
4) I have not mentioned this heretofore in this group, but I have been fighting online the pedo culture that is not only in Hollywood, but  in government as well. I have been called a nut for two years, yet damned near everything I say has been coming true minute by minute now.
5) Mostly, I want to say I do not take any offense to your disagreement or opinions. I hope you feel the same about mine. 

PS - I should trust the Washington Post? They have a crappy record of retracting themselves more than the NYT. I have read all of that, though

no politics. 55 yo crime is all

Don't start any flame wars and this could be very interesting and informative too.

This might explain my logic:
1976 - Stephen Knight writes a book on Jack the Ripper involving the Royal Family. If they had pants on fire awards he would be the world champ, according to the eggheads.
In his book he mentions a character named John Netley. The eggheads erupt in "He doesn't exist." This went on for.... oops, it's still going on.
Knight died way too young, but even I won't cry conspiracy. Just happened. Some years ago the existence of John Netley is proved by his descendants and other means. There is now a photo. The eggheads cry foul! "Oh, you are a Stephen Knight Nutbag."
My problem here is that it has nothing to do with Knight's suspect (Netley was a side player) The Royals. It is that a theory made it word of mouth for a hundred years and some aspects bear out.
Considering that the eggheads are no closer to a solution than the noneggheads (me), why don't they just add John Netley to the info they have as a side issue. If you do genealogy you know the importance of incidental characters. They won't do it.
Let's say Cruz/Netley knows/knew something. Maybe exploring his address, history, and all else migh lead you somewhere.
Now, solely to Cruz. I am not even coming close to saying he did anything wrong. But if he was with GHWBush he may know something he's not telling or was told not to tell. He could be a hero if this comes out and he speaks out.
What I do with my Elvis/Jesse James/JFK/Billy the Kid conspiracies is to keep ideas rotating in my head.
With regards to the pedo thing, I have seen and keep enough proof of what is going on to have had my anonymous say in social media. This started out as a conspiracy.
Charlie, and everyone: I respect all your opinions and beliefs. I do poke fun. I can take fun. This is fun to me. You all are fun to me. I apologize that I often come across with sticky points in my fun. I certainly want to offend no one.
David

MOM MOM!! Where did you get that lost pic of mom?

Yup, photoshop can be fun, but it ruins history

What we do know...ability.




Motive.... he moved to Russia and brought back a bride during an incredibly tense cold war...I see means and motive...I suspect we could implicate the pope if we try to.

Why would a fine upstanding Marine try to defect to Russia get married and then move back to America. Why would he be passing out pro Cuban propaganda in New Orleans. Why was he in Mexico city at the Cuban and Russian embassies several weeks before the assignation. How did he manage to live next door to a Russian woman in Dallas who told about a job the book repository 5-6 weeks before Kennedys visit. But we have to believe LHO acted alone otherwise the whole thing is coup d'tat. The Warren report looks like a poorly put together cover up that has more holes than a fishing net and leaves more questions than answers.