Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2022 14:47:04 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2022 14:49:31 GMT -5
Pointing out and detailing on deficiencies is not bashing, mate, if it's substantiated. All the criticism against the brand, which has been made very public and is highlighting the same issues over and over again, did not seem to have incitated Peterson to improve on much of anything from what I've gathered from my purchases over the last 15 years or so. They've held on a steady course. People who say they love the brand have only said, for the most part: I love the brand, or, they work for me. It's not much of an explanation in the brand's defence. As you personally own 166 Peterson, I would love to hear your take on the brand.  Read my post or don't bother quoting me. Bye. Oh, so you can quote Ron making a suggestion to me, and insult me in the process (and the others giving their opinion and voicing their disappointment), but when I call you on it, that's all you have to say? Screw you too, you bloody, arrogant arsehole. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2022 14:55:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Jul 19, 2022 16:59:35 GMT -5
None of mine look like that. Did you buy them sight unseen? Why did you choose to buy another Peterson after the first couple of bad ones?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2022 18:12:15 GMT -5
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. A lot of people criticize Dunhills, yet they don't know what they're talking about and that's supposed to be fine. And Dunhill owners are also supposed to take it and suck it up.
Yet, when people criticize Peterson, Peterson owners cannot accept it.
If that's the way it is, fine. But without me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Jul 19, 2022 18:26:34 GMT -5
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. A lot of people criticize Dunhills, yet they don't know what they're talking about and that's supposed to be fine. And Dunhill owners are also supposed to take it and suck it up. Yet, when people criticize Peterson, Peterson owners cannot accept it. If that's the way it is, fine. But without me. It's fine. I like my Dunhill, but I don't think that it smokes 10 times as good as my Savinellis. I'm sure they are great pipes. But you must realize that not everyone has the same bad experience with Peterson as you. After 164 years they are still selling more pipes than any other maker I believe. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2022 3:41:39 GMT -5
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. A lot of people criticize Dunhills, yet they don't know what they're talking about and that's supposed to be fine. And Dunhill owners are also supposed to take it and suck it up. Yet, when people criticize Peterson, Peterson owners cannot accept it. If that's the way it is, fine. But without me. It's fine. I like my Dunhill, but I don't think that it smokes 10 times as good as my Savinellis. I'm sure they are great pipes. But you must realize that not everyone has the same bad experience with Peterson as you. After 164 years they are still selling more pipes than any other maker I believe. Chacom is also a big manufacturer, as old as Peterson and producing about the same, or very close, and yet, of the several I bought from them, I have never encountered QC issues as with Peterson. In fact, all the pipes I bought from them were impeccably made. As you mention Savinelli, it was the same. All impeccably made. |
|
