Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2022 14:47:04 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2022 14:49:31 GMT -5
Pointing out and detailing on deficiencies is not bashing, mate, if it's substantiated. All the criticism against the brand, which has been made very public and is highlighting the same issues over and over again, did not seem to have incitated Peterson to improve on much of anything from what I've gathered from my purchases over the last 15 years or so. They've held on a steady course. People who say they love the brand have only said, for the most part: I love the brand, or, they work for me. It's not much of an explanation in the brand's defence. As you personally own 166 Peterson, I would love to hear your take on the brand. Read my post or don't bother quoting me. Bye. Oh, so you can quote Ron making a suggestion to me, and insult me in the process (and the others giving their opinion and voicing their disappointment), but when I call you on it, that's all you have to say? Screw you too, you bloody, arrogant arsehole.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2022 14:55:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Jul 19, 2022 16:59:35 GMT -5
None of mine look like that. Did you buy them sight unseen? Why did you choose to buy another Peterson after the first couple of bad ones?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2022 18:12:15 GMT -5
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. A lot of people criticize Dunhills, yet they don't know what they're talking about and that's supposed to be fine. And Dunhill owners are also supposed to take it and suck it up. Yet, when people criticize Peterson, Peterson owners cannot accept it. If that's the way it is, fine. But without me.
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Jul 19, 2022 18:26:34 GMT -5
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. A lot of people criticize Dunhills, yet they don't know what they're talking about and that's supposed to be fine. And Dunhill owners are also supposed to take it and suck it up. Yet, when people criticize Peterson, Peterson owners cannot accept it. If that's the way it is, fine. But without me. It's fine. I like my Dunhill, but I don't think that it smokes 10 times as good as my Savinellis. I'm sure they are great pipes. But you must realize that not everyone has the same bad experience with Peterson as you. After 164 years they are still selling more pipes than any other maker I believe.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2022 3:41:39 GMT -5
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. A lot of people criticize Dunhills, yet they don't know what they're talking about and that's supposed to be fine. And Dunhill owners are also supposed to take it and suck it up. Yet, when people criticize Peterson, Peterson owners cannot accept it. If that's the way it is, fine. But without me. It's fine. I like my Dunhill, but I don't think that it smokes 10 times as good as my Savinellis. I'm sure they are great pipes. But you must realize that not everyone has the same bad experience with Peterson as you. After 164 years they are still selling more pipes than any other maker I believe. Chacom is also a big manufacturer, as old as Peterson and producing about the same, or very close, and yet, of the several I bought from them, I have never encountered QC issues as with Peterson. In fact, all the pipes I bought from them were impeccably made. As you mention Savinelli, it was the same. All impeccably made.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2022 14:55:28 GMT -5
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. A lot of people criticize Dunhills, yet they don't know what they're talking about and that's supposed to be fine. And Dunhill owners are also supposed to take it and suck it up. Yet, when people criticize Peterson, Peterson owners cannot accept it. If that's the way it is, fine. But without me. It's fine. I like my Dunhill, but I don't think that it smokes 10 times as good as my Savinellis. I'm sure they are great pipes. "But you must realize that not everyone has the same bad experience with Peterson as you." After 164 years they are still selling more pipes than any other maker I believe. Even he probably doesn't. I was about to respond to a friend on another forum who stated unequivocally that EVERY Peterson he had ever smoked was crap. I know he's smoked a lot of Petersons, so I know his statement is garbage. I wrote up a reply, then thought, "Why?" He's just venting for whatever reason, and intends no malice. I have over 150 old Petersons (pre-2000) and obviously, 'collect' them. But I also smoke them. I've been as critical of newer Petes as anyone, and quite frankly, had been going into each new acquisition with negative expectations. But now I look over at my 12-pipe rack of pipes I am currently smoking, and suprisingly (to me) four are 2021-22 acquisitions, and are some of my current favorites: smooth brown 2022 POTY, blasted 2021 Rathbone, terracotta 2021 POTY and a rusticated 2021 POTY. If someone thinks all Petersons are poor and always will be, then they need to have their head examined if they buy another one. And I need to have my head examined if I read more than two of their posts on the topic, which is why I've gone to using 'ignore'.
|
|
|
Post by trailboss on Sept 7, 2022 18:22:30 GMT -5
I was sad to see (Claude) Lordguyrox leave, I think because of this subject, he was a nice guy that sold me some heavily discounted beautiful Pete’s that are a pleasure to smoke.
His premium grades he later offered up, I really would have liked to have bought, I just could not justify in my meager budget.
Everyone has different likes and dislikes for their own tastes, I have never had a problem with my Pete’s, I love them all… but I am not as discriminating (obviously in the positive sense) as many others.
|
|
|
Post by Plainsman on Sept 7, 2022 18:28:21 GMT -5
Claude left? That is a pity.
My three best smokers are two Pete House and a Pub— repeating myself I reckon. Sweet, cool, and pleasant. I guess I’ve been lucky.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2022 19:03:57 GMT -5
I was sad to see (Claude) Lordguyrox leave, I think because of this subject, he was a nice guy that sold me some heavily discounted beautiful Pete’s that are a pleasure to smoke. His premium grades he later offered up, I really would have liked to have bought, I just could not justify in my meager budget. Everyone has different likes and dislikes for their own tastes, I have never had a problem with my Pete’s, I love them all… but I am not as discriminating (obviously in the positive sense) as many others. Which 'premium' Petes were you interested in?;e.g-style, era, line. Lately I have been picking up more of the old 'Deluxe' line - smooth with no band and bone chimneys. They seem to be the most Pete for the buck.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2022 19:07:38 GMT -5
Claude left? That is a pity. My three best smokers are two Pete House and a Pub— repeating myself I reckon. Sweet, cool, and pleasant. I guess I’ve been lucky. The 'Pete Geek' pipe is a D18, so I guess I'll be forced to smoke a big one soon. The only other Pete House pipe I've smoked is an O2 1904 Patent. It's a great smoker, but I can almost fit an entire plug in it.
|
|
|
Post by trailboss on Sept 7, 2022 19:26:32 GMT -5
I was sad to see (Claude) Lordguyrox leave, I think because of this subject, he was a nice guy that sold me some heavily discounted beautiful Pete’s that are a pleasure to smoke. His premium grades he later offered up, I really would have liked to have bought, I just could not justify in my meager budget. Everyone has different likes and dislikes for their own tastes, I have never had a problem with my Pete’s, I love them all… but I am not as discriminating (obviously in the positive sense) as many others. Which 'premium' Petes were you interested in?;e.g-style, era, line. Lately I have been picking up more of the old 'Deluxe' line - smooth with no band and bone chimneys. They seem to be the most Pete for the buck. He had a bunch of current production ones, I am not really in a place to buy anything, it is just that he had some that spiked the impulse. Looking back, they weren’t as expensive/ as high grade as I recall, but they looked great. thebriarpatchforum.com/thread/10238/peterson-sale
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2022 20:11:28 GMT -5
Which 'premium' Petes were you interested in?;e.g-style, era, line. Lately I have been picking up more of the old 'Deluxe' line - smooth with no band and bone chimneys. They seem to be the most Pete for the buck. He had a bunch of current production ones, I am not really in a place to buy anything, it is just that he had some that spiked the impulse. Looking back, they weren’t as expensive/ as high grade as I recall, but they looked great. thebriarpatchforum.com/thread/10238/peterson-saleThose are fine pipes - makes me wonder why he started this thread. The fact is - Peterson makes TONS of pipes so there are bound to be some duds. The recent Rua Spigot release is a perfect example. I was lucky enough to be there right when they dropped at SmokingPipes.EU, so I had my pick of the littler. I wanted a Rathbone, but didn't see one, so I grabbed this Professor that has a phenomenal blast. My understanding is that for this Penzo-project they picked the best ring-grain potential blocks they could find. I've been watching Pete releases for a while, and these were the finest pipes they've released in years, if not decades. I was happy to get the Professor, but still showed up for the US release, still looking for a Rathbone. The US release was not as great, in my opinion. The downside to the great Rua Spigot release was that there didn't seem to be much great briar left for high-end POTY pipes. None of the blasted pipes came remotely close to the quality of the Rua Spigots. Oh well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2022 20:15:49 GMT -5
But because I had such great faith, I was allowed to spot this brand new (hallmarked 2021) Peterson Rathbone a week later, also on the EU site. This isn't like any blast I've seen lately on a Pete, and is reminiscent of some of my old Dunhills. I hit 'buy' within seconds of viewing both sides, and it has turned out to be one of my favorite smokers. I'm curious - does anyone think this is a crappy blast?
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Sept 7, 2022 20:51:18 GMT -5
That is a nice one but my POY 4ab is pretty bad, so much that I won't smoke it. But my other dozen plus Petes are fine.
|
|
|
Post by Silver on Sept 7, 2022 21:05:46 GMT -5
I like it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2022 21:09:56 GMT -5
That is a nice one but my POY 4ab is pretty bad, so much that I won't smoke it. But my other dozen plus Petes are fine. I didn't see very many good blasts in the 2021 POTY, nor in the 2022. I now have a Terracotta, Heritage and rusticated. I stripped the finish off my rusticated to create a dark brown one, and I really love it, and it's a nice smoker. The rustication on those pipes is reminiscent of the original Pete rustications from the 1940's, but they did it a disservice with that red and blue staining - makes it look cheap. Here's the stummel after re-staining and polishing, and a 'before and after'
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Sept 7, 2022 22:44:08 GMT -5
Nice. They hit a soft spot I guess when they blasted mine and it's got a big dent on the front.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2022 10:23:41 GMT -5
Nice. They hit a soft spot I guess when they blasted mine and it's got a big dent on the front. They now sell a lot of pipes like what you're describing. They didn't use to - I have never seen an old malformed blasted Peterson. Bad blasts, but not so much the soft spots. My guess is that they used to let the briar do the talking (and good briar was plentiful enough to meet production targets), whereas now they have a lot of limited releases where a certain number of pipes have to be made, and they simply run out of good briar. Can you imagine how ugly a piece of briar has to be to get relegated to rustication? I think the deeper scoops in the rustication are also indicative of briar issues, even though the result is often very nice. For the 2022 POTY they planned on 925 pipes. I suspect the planned percentages for the various grades was much different from what was produced - they could have sold many more of the high-grade pipes if the good briar had been there. Last year they did a little better in that respect, but the blasts were still generally pretty poor, as you describe, and we saw very few Supremes.
|
|
|
Post by Legend Lover on Sept 8, 2022 11:10:49 GMT -5
But because I had such great faith, I was allowed to spot this brand new (hallmarked 2021) Peterson Rathbone a week later, also on the EU site. This isn't like any blast I've seen lately on a Pete, and is reminiscent of some of my old Dunhills. I hit 'buy' within seconds of viewing both sides, and it has turned out to be one of my favorite smokers. I'm curious - does anyone think this is a crappy blast? I wouldn't knock it, but I've seen better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2022 11:20:40 GMT -5
But because I had such great faith, I was allowed to spot this brand new (hallmarked 2021) Peterson Rathbone a week later, also on the EU site. This isn't like any blast I've seen lately on a Pete, and is reminiscent of some of my old Dunhills. I hit 'buy' within seconds of viewing both sides, and it has turned out to be one of my favorite smokers. I'm curious - does anyone think this is a crappy blast? I wouldn't knock it, but I've seen better. Yeah, it's not technically great, but I love it. But then again, I really liked the pipe the OP posted that had a similar blast. The pebbly side was weird, but I even kind of liked that. I've seen a lot of technically great blasts that I didn't like much. In fact, I only know they are technically great because I've been told they are by forum members. I don't make pipes, so my thoughts are based on aesthetics, not technical execution.
|
|
|
Post by Legend Lover on Sept 8, 2022 17:27:52 GMT -5
I wouldn't knock it, but I've seen better. Yeah, it's not technically great, but I love it. But then again, I really liked the pipe the OP posted that had a similar blast. The pebbly side was weird, but I even kind of liked that. I've seen a lot of technically great blasts that I didn't like much. In fact, I only know they are technically great because I've been told they are by forum members. I don't make pipes, so my thoughts are based on aesthetics, not technical execution. I think, at the end of the day, whatever you like is all that matters.
|
|
rastewart
Junior Member
Posts: 360
First Name: Rich
Favorite Pipe: Freehands, bent bulldogs, and the incomparable Peterson 303
Favorite Tobacco: Mac Baren's Scottish Blend (Mixture), C&D Mountain Camp, C&D Bayou Morning
Location:
|
Post by rastewart on Sept 8, 2022 17:56:52 GMT -5
Yeah, it's not technically great, but I love it. But then again, I really liked the pipe the OP posted that had a similar blast. The pebbly side was weird, but I even kind of liked that. I've seen a lot of technically great blasts that I didn't like much. In fact, I only know they are technically great because I've been told they are by forum members. I don't make pipes, so my thoughts are based on aesthetics, not technical execution. I think, at the end of the day, whatever you like is all that matters. "Fuma quod amas et ama quod fumas"--smoke what you like and like what you smoke; it applies to pipes as well as tobaccos.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2022 18:22:31 GMT -5
I think, at the end of the day, whatever you like is all that matters. "Fuma quod amas et ama quod fumas"--smoke what you like and like what you smoke; it applies to pipes as well as tobaccos.All true, but I think it's interesting that what one person considers a poor blast is considered by someone else, to be at the least, 'an interesting and appealing' blast. Which is why I rarely knock anything that someone else gets excited about...except C&D tobacco.
|
|
|
Post by urbino on Sept 9, 2022 0:00:50 GMT -5
Does Peterson still sell Seconds? Can't remember the last time I saw one. Sounds like a lot of what used to be culled and sold as Seconds are going right on out the door as regular Petersons. Or not. Who knows.
|
|
|
Post by Plainsman on Sept 9, 2022 8:53:04 GMT -5
I wonder if my good luck with my Big Petes might be because, being less popular, they had been hanging around for a while.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2022 9:55:48 GMT -5
Does Peterson still sell Seconds? Can't remember the last time I saw one. Sounds like a lot of what used to be culled and sold as Seconds are going right on out the door as regular Petersons. Or not. Who knows. Popular myth among the anti-Pete guys. Go to SmokingPipes.EU and do a search on 'Irish Seconds'.
|
|
|
Post by urbino on Sept 9, 2022 18:59:38 GMT -5
They just don't sell them here, then?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2022 19:38:21 GMT -5
They just don't sell them here, then? I buy all of my new pipes on the internet - not sure what is sold in shops, but they order all of their pipes from the same place, so they can get anything that the shops in the rest of the world can get.
|
|