Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2017 20:55:09 GMT -5
I think Jim would be the one to really differentiate, but I have a few thoughts on one, which may pertain to all.
So many people rename blends for their own stores. No news here.
I kept wondering about Sutliff Matches vs P&C Matches of the same codger.
I smoked Sutliff first, a few months ago. I got some sweetness and it was fine. Nothing spectacular. Couple weeks ago I tried P&C. I got less sweetness. I gave it another try and realized my sinuses had been messing with me. They were both very similar... but is P&C just repackaging Sutliff?
I finally got both blends in the same place, not an easy trick with my limitations. The cuts are so totally different, yet they both appear to have achieved the same ends.
If you want to take a trip and don't want to crack open a Sweet Cask tub get a few ounces of Sutliff. Slight differences are not really enough, unless a cut is so important.
Though loving to save by buying more I like the tubs. Can't misplace them. Like misplacing a bowling ball. Worth a few dollars more and two ounces less.
So many people rename blends for their own stores. No news here.
I kept wondering about Sutliff Matches vs P&C Matches of the same codger.
I smoked Sutliff first, a few months ago. I got some sweetness and it was fine. Nothing spectacular. Couple weeks ago I tried P&C. I got less sweetness. I gave it another try and realized my sinuses had been messing with me. They were both very similar... but is P&C just repackaging Sutliff?
I finally got both blends in the same place, not an easy trick with my limitations. The cuts are so totally different, yet they both appear to have achieved the same ends.
If you want to take a trip and don't want to crack open a Sweet Cask tub get a few ounces of Sutliff. Slight differences are not really enough, unless a cut is so important.
Though loving to save by buying more I like the tubs. Can't misplace them. Like misplacing a bowling ball. Worth a few dollars more and two ounces less.
