|
Post by urbino on Feb 15, 2024 1:32:00 GMT -5
Me after work. Crappy picture Portrait of the artist as a not entirely unyoung man.
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 1:32:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 1:32:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 1:33:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 1:33:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by urbino on Feb 15, 2024 1:34:28 GMT -5
Nice job catching the launch!
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 1:34:33 GMT -5
My smoking stuff and another of Peanut.
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 1:35:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Feb 15, 2024 1:35:16 GMT -5
Interesting. Are the 1949s the latest graves? Do you develop your own film? Someone was buried there as late as 2014 or something like that. Family plot. I haven't taken the DIY plunge yet. I understand, but the b&w film is super easy. You can get the equipment used for almost nothing. I had a darkroom set up in the spare bedroom of my first house and I used it a lot. Finally got to working too much overtime and had to give it up for the wife's shoes.
|
|
|
Post by urbino on Feb 15, 2024 1:35:30 GMT -5
This one's really striking. The geometric shapes. The harsh, strong contrast. The textures.
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 1:35:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by urbino on Feb 15, 2024 1:39:04 GMT -5
Who's this cheerful critter?
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 1:44:14 GMT -5
Someone was buried there as late as 2014 or something like that. Family plot. I haven't taken the DIY plunge yet. I understand, but the b&w film is super easy. You can get the equipment used for almost nothing. I had a darkroom set up in the spare bedroom of my first house and I used it a lot. Finally got to working too much overtime and had to give it up for the wife's shoes. I've seen where I can basically do it in my kitchen, just need a changing bag to load film onto spools I guess, then the chemicals. One of these days.
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 1:45:27 GMT -5
Who's this cheerful critter? That is their dog, Sophie. Always happy.
|
|
|
Post by urbino on Feb 15, 2024 2:01:16 GMT -5
I understand, but the b&w film is super easy. You can get the equipment used for almost nothing. I had a darkroom set up in the spare bedroom of my first house and I used it a lot. Finally got to working too much overtime and had to give it up for the wife's shoes. I've seen where I can basically do it in my kitchen, just need a changing bag to load film onto spools I guess, then the chemicals. One of these days. There's a little bit of getting the hang of opening the film canister and then getting the film started onto the spool when you can't see what you're doing, but it's not too bad.
|
|
|
Post by urbino on Feb 15, 2024 2:02:50 GMT -5
Your friends have quite the backyard space.
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 2:04:59 GMT -5
This one's really striking. The geometric shapes. The harsh, strong contrast. The textures. This was shot on Kodak Portra 160
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 2:08:36 GMT -5
Your friends have quite the backyard space. She's a retired nurse, still doing nursing...and a Master Gardener. Volunteers at a lot of places such as the Veterans home and their growing space. Her and her husband work really hard on their back yard living space every year. It's always beautiful.
|
|
|
Post by urbino on Feb 15, 2024 2:24:32 GMT -5
This one's really striking. The geometric shapes. The harsh, strong contrast. The textures. This was shot on Kodak Portra 160 I've completely lost what film knowledge I had. I knew the Fuji films pretty well for a while, some of the Ilford b&w films, and a couple of the Kodak ones a little bit, but that all went by the wayside.
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 2:46:37 GMT -5
This was shot on Kodak Portra 160 I've completely lost what film knowledge I had. I knew the Fuji films pretty well for a while, some of the Ilford b&w films, and a couple of the Kodak ones a little bit, but that all went by the wayside. I'm still figuring things out. Don't always seem to have a lot of time. Especially while working graveyard shift.
|
|
|
Post by urbino on Feb 15, 2024 2:51:32 GMT -5
I've completely lost what film knowledge I had. I knew the Fuji films pretty well for a while, some of the Ilford b&w films, and a couple of the Kodak ones a little bit, but that all went by the wayside. I'm still figuring things out. Don't always seem to have a lot of time. Especially while working graveyard shift. Know what that's like. How are things going in general? BTW, you'll always be kinda figuring things out in photography. That's one of the great things about it, and one of the most frustrating.
|
|
The Wizzard
Junior Member
Posts: 149
Favorite Pipe: Vauen Friddo
Favorite Tobacco: Hunting Creek
Location:
|
Post by The Wizzard on Feb 15, 2024 4:56:34 GMT -5
I sold my Leica single lens reflex camera many years ago. There are things I have to do and things I like to do. By the time I finish the things I have to do, I'm too tired to do the things I'ld like to do. - Old age I guess. I have many hobbies but I tend to circulate them. I always find time for my pipe in nice weather though. I love American Cane Self Defence and of course Mrs. Zarnicky and the After Dinner Ukulele Society. I'm glad that you have found photography to help fill the void. Good for you!
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Feb 15, 2024 14:54:37 GMT -5
This was shot on Kodak Portra 160 I've completely lost what film knowledge I had. I knew the Fuji films pretty well for a while, some of the Ilford b&w films, and a couple of the Kodak ones a little bit, but that all went by the wayside. I hear that! I shot mostly Tri-x for b&w, and Agfachrome for color. Some Fujichrome. All the pics I sold were on the Agfa.
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Feb 15, 2024 14:57:28 GMT -5
I sold my Leica single lens reflex camera many years ago. There are things I have to do and things I like to do. By the time I finish the things I have to do, I'm too tired to do the things I'ld like to do. - Old age I guess. I have many hobbies but I tend to circulate them. I always find time for my pipe in nice weather though. I love American Cane Self Defence and of course Mrs. Zarnicky and the After Dinner Ukulele Society. I'm glad that you have found photography to help fill the void. Good for you! I'm in the same boat. I got a Lumix digital camera that will do anything I want and doesn't make me feel guilty.
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Feb 15, 2024 15:21:52 GMT -5
I understand, but the b&w film is super easy. You can get the equipment used for almost nothing. I had a darkroom set up in the spare bedroom of my first house and I used it a lot. Finally got to working too much overtime and had to give it up for the wife's shoes. I've seen where I can basically do it in my kitchen, just need a changing bag to load film onto spools I guess, then the chemicals. One of these days. When I was into the hobby photo stuff, I was working all day in a darkroom. I ran a process camera that was installed through the wall with a light proof rotating door. The camera could hold an original from a 110 slide up to a 6x8 foot painting. Inside the subject vacuum frame it would hold a 5x6 foot flat photo, or a dozen or more smaller photos. I could also mount slides in oil on the front. The subject frame was 2 layers of glass that had a seal that could pull a vacuum to flatten subject and hold it in place. There was a removable rubber mat for the vacuum. It had 4 15000 lumen pulsed zemon lamps and huge lenses that weighed 30 pounds. On the other side of the wall was a vacuum back that would hold film up to 48x48 inches, plus another rolling back that would hold a 5x6 foot piece of film. Sheets of film up to 24 by 30 came precut, anything larger I had to cut from 200 foot rolls. Anyway, the point I meant to make is that the back darkroom was huge. We had huge trays for the developer, fix and rinse. Just the trays took up 10 by 30 feet. Anything below 36 inches went through the automatic film processor. So I was used to having a lot of room to move around. So, when I tried the loading bag, I was just a PITA. It's easy to set up a darkroom if you have a spare room. And the bag is only for spools. You can't put an enlarger in a bag The greatest b&w photographers were actually masters of the enlarger. Learning to use the enlarger is an adventure. You get the hang of dodging and masking, plus combining pictures through double exposure is really creative.
|
|
|
Post by CrustyCat on Feb 15, 2024 17:43:25 GMT -5
I've seen where I can basically do it in my kitchen, just need a changing bag to load film onto spools I guess, then the chemicals. One of these days. When I was into the hobby photo stuff, I was working all day in a darkroom. I ran a process camera that was installed through the wall with a light proof rotating door. The camera could hold an original from a 110 slide up to a 6x8 foot painting. Inside the subject vacuum frame it would hold a 5x6 foot flat photo, or a dozen or more smaller photos. I could also mount slides in oil on the front. The subject frame was 2 layers of glass that had a seal that could pull a vacuum to flatten subject and hold it in place. There was a removable rubber mat for the vacuum. It had 4 15000 lumen pulsed zemon lamps and huge lenses that weighed 30 pounds. On the other side of the wall was a vacuum back that would hold film up to 48x48 inches, plus another rolling back that would hold a 5x6 foot piece of film. Sheets of film up to 24 by 30 came precut, anything larger I had to cut from 200 foot rolls. Anyway, the point I meant to make is that the back darkroom was huge. We had huge trays for the developer, fix and rinse. Just the trays took up 10 by 30 feet. Anything below 36 inches went through the automatic film processor. So I was used to having a lot of room to move around. So, when I tried the loading bag, I was just a PITA. It's easy to set up a darkroom if you have a spare room. And the bag is only for spools. You can't put an enlarger in a bag The greatest b&w photographers were actually masters of the enlarger. Learning to use the enlarger is an adventure. You get the hang of dodging and masking, plus combining pictures through double exposure is really creative. That sounds like a really interesting setup. I still have cameras I've purchased or had serviced I need to test. I have some relatively inexpensive B&W film, Kentmere PAN 100 and 400 24 EXP, I use to test cameras. It's only 4.99 a roll for 35mm. It's manufactured by Harmon Technology who also does Ilford. I just need to take it one step at a time. I need to learn to develop the film. I'll buy the stuff and figure it out eventually. I do have a couple of different scanners for film so I'm ok there. Personally, I don't like messing with my negatives on the computer. The software I have is fair, but I'm not going to pay the subscription to adobe for lightroom and photoshop. Being color blind doesn't help either. I just know what I like to look at. I will use the software I have to clean up bad spots of old negatives I have when I have scanned them. The only film class I ever took was in the seventh grade. Probably only one semester, but I can't really remember. I did shoot some b&w film of some ducks at a park on a Kodak Instamatic. It's all mom could afford. It was the family camera. My problem is, I tend to be a collector of things. I get into something, and I buy a bunch of different versions of whatever it may be, then I'll eventually calm down. For example, I got into wet shaving. I have many old razors, brushes, blades, etc. but I usually just use the same stuff. I really like fountain pens, so I got a bunch of different ones of those, I haven't used them all, but I have them. When I started smoking pipes, sheesh, I only have a couple of "expensive" pipes, but I also have a lot of cheap pipes. I really dig some of the old Dr. Grabow pipes, so I have a bunch of those, and cobs, and others. Along with the tobacco. Tobacco is a little easier, because if there is something I don't like, I won't buy it. Then I got into photography and film cameras. Holy macaroni. I may have gone just a little overboard. Like I said, I still have many cameras to test. Besides the cameras I purchased on my own, I also got a couple from members here that I haven't tested yet, from pepesdad1 and urbino and I feel bad about that. I don't have a Leica rangefinder, but I do have a Leica SLR, which was actually pretty cheap. I did get a Hasselblad 500 C/M, still need to test it. And many other various 35mm and 120 film cameras. Plus 3 digital cameras. Without my wife here to keep me in check, I lost a little control. But as with most things, I've started to lose my acquisition cravings. The biggest thing I'm short of most of the time is, well, time. That's me in a nutshell. I will post more pics if I find any worthy of posting. That was kind of a rambling post, wasn't it?
|
|
|
Post by urbino on Feb 15, 2024 18:26:37 GMT -5
When I was into the hobby photo stuff, I was working all day in a darkroom. I ran a process camera that was installed through the wall with a light proof rotating door. The camera could hold an original from a 110 slide up to a 6x8 foot painting. Inside the subject vacuum frame it would hold a 5x6 foot flat photo, or a dozen or more smaller photos. I could also mount slides in oil on the front. The subject frame was 2 layers of glass that had a seal that could pull a vacuum to flatten subject and hold it in place. There was a removable rubber mat for the vacuum. It had 4 15000 lumen pulsed zemon lamps and huge lenses that weighed 30 pounds. On the other side of the wall was a vacuum back that would hold film up to 48x48 inches, plus another rolling back that would hold a 5x6 foot piece of film. Sheets of film up to 24 by 30 came precut, anything larger I had to cut from 200 foot rolls. Anyway, the point I meant to make is that the back darkroom was huge. We had huge trays for the developer, fix and rinse. Just the trays took up 10 by 30 feet. Anything below 36 inches went through the automatic film processor. So I was used to having a lot of room to move around. So, when I tried the loading bag, I was just a PITA. It's easy to set up a darkroom if you have a spare room. And the bag is only for spools. You can't put an enlarger in a bag The greatest b&w photographers were actually masters of the enlarger. Learning to use the enlarger is an adventure. You get the hang of dodging and masking, plus combining pictures through double exposure is really creative. That sounds like a really interesting setup. I still have cameras I've purchased or had serviced I need to test. I have some relatively inexpensive B&W film, Kentmere PAN 100 and 400 24 EXP, I use to test cameras. It's only 4.99 a roll for 35mm. It's manufactured by Harmon Technology who also does Ilford. I just need to take it one step at a time. I need to learn to develop the film. I'll buy the stuff and figure it out eventually. I do have a couple of different scanners for film so I'm ok there. Personally, I don't like messing with my negatives on the computer. The software I have is fair, but I'm not going to pay the subscription to adobe for lightroom and photoshop. Being color blind doesn't help either. I just know what I like to look at. I will use the software I have to clean up bad spots of old negatives I have when I have scanned them. The only film class I ever took was in the seventh grade. Probably only one semester, but I can't really remember. I did shoot some b&w film of some ducks at a park on a Kodak Instamatic. It's all mom could afford. It was the family camera. My problem is, I tend to be a collector of things. I get into something, and I buy a bunch of different versions of whatever it may be, then I'll eventually calm down. For example, I got into wet shaving. I have many old razors, brushes, blades, etc. but I usually just use the same stuff. I really like fountain pens, so I got a bunch of different ones of those, I haven't used them all, but I have them. When I started smoking pipes, sheesh, I only have a couple of "expensive" pipes, but I also have a lot of cheap pipes. I really dig some of the old Dr. Grabow pipes, so I have a bunch of those, and cobs, and others. Along with the tobacco. Tobacco is a little easier, because if there is something I don't like, I won't buy it. Then I got into photography and film cameras. Holy macaroni. I may have gone just a little overboard. Like I said, I still have many cameras to test. Besides the cameras I purchased on my own, I also got a couple from members here that I haven't tested yet, from pepesdad1 and urbino and I feel bad about that. I don't have a Leica rangefinder, but I do have a Leica SLR, which was actually pretty cheap. I did get a Hasselblad 500 C/M, still need to test it. And many other various 35mm and 120 film cameras. Plus 3 digital cameras. Without my wife here to keep me in check, I lost a little control. But as with most things, I've started to lose my acquisition cravings. The biggest thing I'm short of most of the time is, well, time. That's me in a nutshell. I will post more pics if I find any worthy of posting. That was kind of a rambling post, wasn't it? No worries, Kevin. A gift doesn't carry an obligation.
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Feb 15, 2024 18:58:04 GMT -5
When I was into the hobby photo stuff, I was working all day in a darkroom. I ran a process camera that was installed through the wall with a light proof rotating door. The camera could hold an original from a 110 slide up to a 6x8 foot painting. Inside the subject vacuum frame it would hold a 5x6 foot flat photo, or a dozen or more smaller photos. I could also mount slides in oil on the front. The subject frame was 2 layers of glass that had a seal that could pull a vacuum to flatten subject and hold it in place. There was a removable rubber mat for the vacuum. It had 4 15000 lumen pulsed zemon lamps and huge lenses that weighed 30 pounds. On the other side of the wall was a vacuum back that would hold film up to 48x48 inches, plus another rolling back that would hold a 5x6 foot piece of film. Sheets of film up to 24 by 30 came precut, anything larger I had to cut from 200 foot rolls. Anyway, the point I meant to make is that the back darkroom was huge. We had huge trays for the developer, fix and rinse. Just the trays took up 10 by 30 feet. Anything below 36 inches went through the automatic film processor. So I was used to having a lot of room to move around. So, when I tried the loading bag, I was just a PITA. It's easy to set up a darkroom if you have a spare room. And the bag is only for spools. You can't put an enlarger in a bag The greatest b&w photographers were actually masters of the enlarger. Learning to use the enlarger is an adventure. You get the hang of dodging and masking, plus combining pictures through double exposure is really creative. That sounds like a really interesting setup. I still have cameras I've purchased or had serviced I need to test. I have some relatively inexpensive B&W film, Kentmere PAN 100 and 400 24 EXP, I use to test cameras. It's only 4.99 a roll for 35mm. It's manufactured by Harmon Technology who also does Ilford. I just need to take it one step at a time. I need to learn to develop the film. I'll buy the stuff and figure it out eventually. I do have a couple of different scanners for film so I'm ok there. Personally, I don't like messing with my negatives on the computer. The software I have is fair, but I'm not going to pay the subscription to adobe for lightroom and photoshop. Being color blind doesn't help either. I just know what I like to look at. I will use the software I have to clean up bad spots of old negatives I have when I have scanned them. The only film class I ever took was in the seventh grade. Probably only one semester, but I can't really remember. I did shoot some b&w film of some ducks at a park on a Kodak Instamatic. It's all mom could afford. It was the family camera. My problem is, I tend to be a collector of things. I get into something, and I buy a bunch of different versions of whatever it may be, then I'll eventually calm down. For example, I got into wet shaving. I have many old razors, brushes, blades, etc. but I usually just use the same stuff. I really like fountain pens, so I got a bunch of different ones of those, I haven't used them all, but I have them. When I started smoking pipes, sheesh, I only have a couple of "expensive" pipes, but I also have a lot of cheap pipes. I really dig some of the old Dr. Grabow pipes, so I have a bunch of those, and cobs, and others. Along with the tobacco. Tobacco is a little easier, because if there is something I don't like, I won't buy it. Then I got into photography and film cameras. Holy macaroni. I may have gone just a little overboard. Like I said, I still have many cameras to test. Besides the cameras I purchased on my own, I also got a couple from members here that I haven't tested yet, from pepesdad1 and urbino and I feel bad about that. I don't have a Leica rangefinder, but I do have a Leica SLR, which was actually pretty cheap. I did get a Hasselblad 500 C/M, still need to test it. And many other various 35mm and 120 film cameras. Plus 3 digital cameras. Without my wife here to keep me in check, I lost a little control. But as with most things, I've started to lose my acquisition cravings. The biggest thing I'm short of most of the time is, well, time. That's me in a nutshell. I will post more pics if I find any worthy of posting. That was kind of a rambling post, wasn't it? It really was. Sorry. It's one of my subjects. I know how to do so many things that sometimes I feel like I need to over-explain.
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Feb 15, 2024 19:02:51 GMT -5
I have Photoshop and and Light Studio that I got before they went to subscription. I would never pay the price for the new editions. I have a pro version of Photoshop from work,probably a 1995 version that still runs, but since I don't need to do separations anymore it's in a box in the attic.
|
|
|
Post by Ronv69 on Feb 15, 2024 22:52:26 GMT -5
Here a couple of samples of the genre. Neither is exactly what I operated
|
|